IF you need to edit a PDF acrobat is still required. I have not found a freeby that will edit a PDF. Small, fast, and does exactly what I need and no more. If I wanted to use Windows crap and windows-related crap I would by an inferior piece of electronic trash forever known as PC's. I like the toolbar on the bottom that appears when you pass the cursor over, and the quality is pretty decent while reading a document.
- setup new mail account on mac!
- big mac daddy mac and cheese;
- tech | business | life!
- 10 Comments.
This is getting ridiculous Adobe I had to take a screenshot On Windows, Foxit Reader is also a good alternative. It is light and having good number of features. I use Foxxit reader and love it. And now I don't have all the issues with slow running and bloat that Adobe seems not to be able to fix. Remember you can try any third party free reader and see if you like it before you remove Adobe reader. Easy to use and beside that most of nowdays browsers have built-in pdf reader So i dont even see reason to keep adobe reader on pc.. Thank you for this piece of information.
I had no idea that this was the reason I have learned to dislike reader. This has been very informative. What do you guys think about Foxit Reader!!! Moreover its new tab feature gives good feel and larger icons helps in good usage of the reader, it is light, multi-tabs,secure and free. Especially better than adobe and its non-stop updates. What say!!!! Like the alternatives presented here. Good work Chris! I use Adobe Acrobat Pro, both at work and at home, and frankly, as much as it pains me, the tool that was built to do the job does it.
Adobe Reader always struck me as a "demo" version of Pro - intentionally slower, incapable of doing a million little things but leaving the options in the menus! Sumatra is quick for just reading, as are a few of the other resource-light readers. I am convinced but adobe is my first choice because it offers more then any other readers. The most websites requires adobe reader only so first choose always adobe reader.
I am convinced but adobe is my first choice. Adobe Reader has only given me burdens. And also its slow at startup. Reader is slow and bloated and a space-waster. Settled with SumatraPDF which gets the work done without bell and whistles. I never like PDF reader with too many toolbars.
It detracts me from actually reading. I uninstalled Adobe pdf reader 5 years ago and switched to Foxit reader. Now it is the time to remove that too. Google chrome is good enough to handle pdf related needs. If you just reading and use the basic tools for PDF, its okay. I use Nitro the freeware version It supports digital signatures and more. I do keep the Adobe Reader installed and updated just in case I try to open something that Nitro can't handle, but that has been once, I think in several years. The Firefox reader is actually more problematic for me -- it often fails to properly show PDFs it lets me know though -- then I have to open it in Adobe Acrobat.
Have you tried Sumatra? I don't know whether to cry or celebrate. Adobe does not offer a Linux version of the Reader. I know, I will celebrate. I use Adobe, as it is the only program with all the abilities I need in my business. I have experimented with other programs, as always end up back with Adobe. I send out a lot of PDF's for review and signature, and it is the easist to use for my clients. So I will continue to use it, while I do agree there are a lot of good options out there, just not for my business.
Tried the Windows option, great for everyday use, but too many options I need are missing. So back to WinZip, as it is the familar Program and contains all I need. Excellent commentary.hostmaster.chodaugia.com.vn/hard-mountain-book-iii-of-the-appalachian.php
Apple Preview vs. PDF Expert 5: Why You Should Upgrade Your PDF Viewer
I think that's it. It's needed only in business environment. For everyday PDF and ebook viewing, you don't need any of those features at all, thus negating the need of Adobe Reader. It comes with a load of features for free, including highlighting and OCR. I have used pdf Xchange viewer for some time.
I find that it is much better and faster than Adobe. However, USPS has recently added the ability to download your label in PDF format instead of printing directly from the website, which would negate the need for the Adobe Reader requirement. As long as high quality printed PDF output is not required, your assertion that Adobe Reader is not required is correct. However, at least in a business situation, I would always have it installed if for no other reason than for the occasion of printing a label from any of the major shipping services, Avery Design-N-Print Online, or the admittedly rare need to print a hard copy of a PDF for legal or tax reasons.
If you disable the unnecessary Adobe start-up services, Adobe Reader will consume no system resources until you actually need to use it. Foxit Reader on an old Windows computer. On Mac, Preview is not bad but not very good either. For a light weighted reader on Mac I prefer Skim, http: Used to be, you could download a zipped version of Foxit, but they changed it, added crap I didn't need, and made it.
After that, I switched to Sumatra. I used some other brand's PDF browser, it's definitely better and makes my PC run less application like background processes. Actually, we do need Adobe reader, and in Linux. The reason: As much as I dislike Adobe Reader you have to admit that it is the only reliable reader.
Apple Preview vs. PDF Expert 5: Upgrading is Wiser
I try not to use it but some docs simply do not show up correct in other readers I have tried approximately throughout the years. Accented characters, special fonts, presentations turned to pdf, mathematical expressions. That is sad as it really is a nasty beast when it comes to resources. My Physics and Math textbooks shows up okay in Sumatra. I think that problem can be traced to how that PDF was made. Never had a problem with Foxit Reader.
In fact, other than support for plug-ins mostly for DRM'ed documents I can't think of anything Foxit does less well than the Adobe product, and it is much smaller and faster! I have been using Foxit Reader for years. Also Bullzip for my PDF printer app. Both are much faster and more secure. Adobe has never ever caused me any issues security or speed.
This sounds like yet another attempt to have a go at something perfectly harmless tat's been around for years and it's free!!!!!!!! Has there been any testing on the integrated so called pdf readers???? I doubt it, and they're probably more likely to cause a problem than Adobe!!!
Any alternative PDF readers I've used over the years caused exactly no problem at all, while Reader constantly froze when opening anything over a hundred pages. It's free, but it's definitely not harmless. Security holes are found every so often, and it eats more resource than a reader should. I completely disagree when you tell someone to upgrade their PC just to run a reader software.
It's hardly necessary. Firstly I didn't suggest getting a decent pc to just read Adobe pdfs. What I really meant was that if your pc is struggling with something like Adobe reader, then you really could do with either someone checking your pc and or upgrading as all my pcs I have ever had and I've built many have never ever had trouble with Adobe reader. I just checked how many pages my current pc will load and how long, it was a car manual with pages and loaded completely within less than 2 seconds. Now that's my experience with Adobe and I just did a search on the net to see if there are any posts like this, guess what not a single one.
PDF Expert Trumps with Organization and Customization
Please will sites like this stop rubishing perfectly good software!!!!!!!!!! Adobe's software is not just a dumb reader. It can even fill questionnaires in PDF's. It allows interactive content on PDF's. I've seen a demo of it some time ago by an Adobe specialist and I've even no idea it could do such things. You make a good argument.
Most people never make use of those options though, which is unfortunate as they would help alleviate a lot of business problems inexpensively. I think some companies and enterprises use such technologies. Therefore we don't see them much around. I agree. It does offer lot more security holes than other PDF readers. That alone makes it unfit for use, no matter what other features it might offer. True, but Foxit Reader can be used to fill out forms and even to type over existing PDFs great for those forms that were not designed to be interactive, i.
This is true, adobe reader hugs too much space on computers. I have tried to use alternative PDF readers and in most cases I have done this successfully, but occasionally I will meet a web site that will insist that Adobe Reader be used to open the PDF file. Personally, I can usually work around that requirement, but I have users that would be quite frustrated if they had another reader installed.
I also like Sumatra reader, but it tends to be light on features. Quite the contrary, as I picked Sumatra as my primary reader because it doesn't have bell-and-whistles. I use Foxit Reader and there have seen a number of security patches over the years. However, the number and seriousness of those is far less than in Adobe Reader.
What the heck is the reason for that requirement? Every Mac user should be familiar with Preview. Yet it provides some highlighting tools here and there, but PDF files have the natural capacity to be very interactive. One such alternative is PDF Expert 5. It has several great tools and signing options wrapped up in a great UI, but it does cost money for the software. Plus, different tools get their own sets of options.
For shapes, you can adjust the stroke width, opacity, border color, fill color and more.
Related adobe reader for mac vs preview
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved